Trump’s mass deportation makes no sense

(Click here to read the article by NBC)

I saw this headline on NBC news and wasn’t surprised. It was obvious that Trump’s proposal to ‘fix’ illegal immigration would be used as a gateway to undertake his racist endeavours. Trump thinks that immigrants can “infest” the US. But why is it so important to have an all-American America? It doesn’t make sense, there is no benefit in doing so.

For example, I grew up in England and all I’ve ever known is England, so if I went back to Hong Kong, I would essentially be the same as an immigrant there. I cannot read or write Chinese, only speak, I have no idea where anything is and I don’t have any friends there. But the law does not say so, because I was born in Hong Kong and my parents, grandparents, great grandparents and all my ancestors are Chinese so I will for ever remain a Hong Kong citizen (unless I relinquish my status). I’m not rejecting my origins, Hong Kong is a great holiday place for me, but I would never have a life there because I prefer England. Sure I was born in Hong Kong but that means nothing if I didn’t spend time there. On the other hand, I know where everything is in England, I am fluent in English and I have a plethora of connections here. I will get a stable job here and pay my taxes to the UK government. I have and will live my best life in England. But I wasn’t born here.

The point is, upbringing probably contributes to 90% of someone’s identity. Thus, in relation to Trump’s selfish notion that immigrants can “infest” the US, American-born citizens who were raised in a different country exist. So if they were to go back to America, they would essentially be immigrants, only they don’t have this status legally. So why isn’t Trump deporting them too? Simply because of their race. Trump is childishly discriminating and it’s disgusting. Obviously, every American-born who was raised elsewhere has every right to go back and start a life like any immigrant would, but I’m making a point that Trump’s all-American America is illogical and pointless. Saying that immigrants can “infest” the US is completely meaningless.

Why can’t they look beyond the colour of our skins and see the benefit in talent, skill and potential? Race pays no contribution to building a stronger country, intelligence does. Look through the rose-tinted spectacles and see only the behaviours of people, not appearance.

Crazy Rich Asians is actually more relatable than you think

DISCLAIMER: THERE ARE SPOILERS. DO NOT READ IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THE STORYLINE.

Yesterday, the move ‘Crazy Rich Asians’ released in the UK, about 20 years after all the other countries but finally, it came. Of course, my mum and I went to watch it.

For me, it was so empowering.

The affluence was just for entertainment, the messages conveyed were in fact more relatable than I had anticipated. Indeed, Kwan very much focussed on rich families and their way of life, but he also emphasised the issue of natives not accepting someone because they were raised differently. Rachel Chu was Chinese-born, but she was raised in America and it is for that reason Eleanor Sung-Young did not accept Rachel as her son’s girlfriend. It was brought to my attention that the notion of having “pure blood” seems to be very significant in Asian families. However, Rachel’s courageousness in standing up to Eleanor was extremely empowering for me as a British-raised Chinese.

“If Nick chose me, he would lose his family. And if he chose his family, he might spend the rest of his life resenting you.”

The game of Mahjong was used as a metaphor where Rachel gave Eleanor the piece in which she could have won but instead, Eleanor won with that same piece. This piece represented Nick. Eleanor won the game but Rachel revealed that she had a much stronger set, had she won. Because in giving up Nick for the sake of not losing his family, she holds the most integrity, the most dignity and the most respect.

Additionally, Kwan included some great feminist moments through Astrid’s story. Astrid was a kind and compassionate mother who married a “commoner”. Michael hated her affluence and felt insignificant in her presence because he wasn’t the breadwinner. Even when they discussed his affair with another woman on the way to the wedding, he shamed Astrid for sensibly not wanting to make a scene. He said that nothing he does is significant even when he has an affair. That is so ridiculously self-centred. The fact that Astrid was the only initially accepting ‘crazy rich asian’ and was the only one who actually made “commoners” feel valued made me sympathise her a lot when she was maltreated by her husband. Of course, Astrid left Michael, and the scene of her walking out the apartment like it was a catwalk was exceedingly empowering for me as a woman.

Therefore, for the majority of us who aren’t crazy rich, you’d think you would just wistfully sit through this movie when you didn’t buy popcorn because it was too expensive but Astrid just bought a pair of earrings for $1.5million. But it is actually such a relatable and empowering story for the immigrants and the feminists.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started